Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. RANDALL, 12-20121. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20120629b58 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 28, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING DEFENDANT'S PLEA OF GUILTY AS TO THE INDICTMENT, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge. A plea hearing was conducted on June 7, 2012, by United States Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder pursuant to the defendant's consent. The magistrate judge issued his report on June 8, 2012, recommending that this Court accept the defendant's plea of guilty as to the sole count of the indictment. As of
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING DEFENDANT'S PLEA OF GUILTY AS TO THE INDICTMENT, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge.

A plea hearing was conducted on June 7, 2012, by United States Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder pursuant to the defendant's consent. The magistrate judge issued his report on June 8, 2012, recommending that this Court accept the defendant's plea of guilty as to the sole count of the indictment. As of today's date, no party has filed any objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. The election to not file objections to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 23) is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that the defendant's plea of guilty as to the sole count of the indictment is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 Plea Agreement (ECF No. 20) is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer