ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation (ECF No. 143) issued by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk on June 26, 2012, on the Plaintiff's emergency motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 134). Judge Hluchaniuk reports that Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief regarding Defendants' treatment of Plaintiff's pain related (apparently) to her Hepatitis C. Plaintiff has not offered evidence regarding what treatment she should be given, Judge Hluchaniuk further reports, rather Plaintiff simply contends that Defendants are not doing enough to address her problems. Judge Hluchaniuk recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's motion, explaining: "It is clear from the pleadings that defendant is attempting to address plaintiff's problems in a professional manner even if that treatment does not afford plaintiff all the relief she hopes for."

Any party may serve and file written objections "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy" of the report and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a "de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made." Id. The Court is not obligated to review the portions of the report to which no objection was made. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). As of today's date, no party has filed any objections to Judge Grand's report and recommendation.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Judge Hluchaniuk's report and recommendation (ECF No. 143) is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's emergency motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 134) is DENIED.