ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING DEFENDANT RAJA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING DEFENDANTS RAJA AND PRISON HEALTH SERVICES' MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT RAJA ONLY

DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are two reports issued on July 5, 2012 by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The first recommends that this Court grant defendant Raja's motion for summary judgment; the second recommends that this Court deny defendants Raja and Prison Health Services, Inc.'s motion to dismiss. Although the magistrate judge's report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed thus far. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendations [dkt. #153, 154] are ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that defendant Raja's motion for summary judgment [dkt. #132] is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that defendants Raja and Prison Health Services, Inc.'s motion to dismiss [dkt. #112] is DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with respect to defendant Raja only.