Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PAULL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 11-CV-11733. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20120730610 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (#20), DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#18), AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#12) GEORGE CARAM STEEH, District Judge. On April 20, 2011, plaintiff filed a complaint for judicial review following an adverse decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Majzoub. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. On July 11, 2012, Magistrate Judge Majzoub issu
More

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (#20), DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#18), AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#12)

GEORGE CARAM STEEH, District Judge.

On April 20, 2011, plaintiff filed a complaint for judicial review following an adverse decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Majzoub. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. On July 11, 2012, Magistrate Judge Majzoub issued a report and recommendation on the cross-motions for summary judgment. In her report, Magistrate Judge Majzoub recommends defendant's motion for summary judgment be denied, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be granted in part, and that, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g), this case be remanded to the ALJ for further proceedings. The parties have not filed objections to the report and recommendation, and the deadline for doing so has passed. The court has reviewed the report and recommendation, and in the absence of timely objection,

The court hereby adopts Magistrate Judge Majzoub's July 11, 2012 report and recommendation. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART to the extent it seeks remand and DENIED IN PART to the extent it seeks an award of benefits, and this case is REMANDED to the ALJ for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer