RISAK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 12-cv-10185. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20130627c90
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2013
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 9), and (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 12) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk's Report and Recommendation Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 9) Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 12), and Affirming the findings of the Commissioner. Having
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 9), and (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 12) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk's Report and Recommendation Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 9) Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 12), and Affirming the findings of the Commissioner. Having ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 9), and (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 12)
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk's Report and Recommendation Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 9) Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 12), and Affirming the findings of the Commissioner.
Having reviewed that Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, AFFIRMS the findings of the Commissioner.
This Order closes the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
