McCORMICK v. DOES, 13-CV-11098. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20130805800
Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 02, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2013
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S [5] MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS MOOT ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge. On June 28, 2013, Magistrate Judge David R. Grand issued a Report and Recommendation in the above-captioned matter recommending that the court deny Plaintiff Roosevelt McCormick's motion for summary judgment as moot. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived. 1 Having reviewed
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S [5] MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS MOOT ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge. On June 28, 2013, Magistrate Judge David R. Grand issued a Report and Recommendation in the above-captioned matter recommending that the court deny Plaintiff Roosevelt McCormick's motion for summary judgment as moot. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived. 1 Having reviewed ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S [5] MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS MOOT
ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.
On June 28, 2013, Magistrate Judge David R. Grand issued a Report and Recommendation in the above-captioned matter recommending that the court deny Plaintiff Roosevelt McCormick's motion for summary judgment as moot. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1
Having reviewed the file and the Report, the court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this Order.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [5] is DENIED as moot.
FootNotes
1. The failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the court from its duty to independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
Source: Leagle
