ARMSTRONG v. SCIR AIR SECURITY, 12-10276. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20130809a04
Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 08, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2013
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge. For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on August 8, 2013, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery [Doc. #33] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Within 14 days of the date of this Order, Defendant shall produce a copy of the SCIS Air Security Vehicle Inspection Report requested in Document Request No. 2, and the documents relating to SCIS's investigation involving the harassment complaints raised by both Dana Christensen and the Pl
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge. For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on August 8, 2013, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery [Doc. #33] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Within 14 days of the date of this Order, Defendant shall produce a copy of the SCIS Air Security Vehicle Inspection Report requested in Document Request No. 2, and the documents relating to SCIS's investigation involving the harassment complaints raised by both Dana Christensen and the Pla..
More
ORDER
R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge.
For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on August 8, 2013, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery [Doc. #33] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
Within 14 days of the date of this Order, Defendant shall produce a copy of the SCIS Air Security Vehicle Inspection Report requested in Document Request No. 2, and the documents relating to SCIS's investigation involving the harassment complaints raised by both Dana Christensen and the Plaintiff, requested in Document Request No. 4.
In all other respects, the Motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
