Filed: Aug. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2013
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge. At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on August 26, 2013 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court On May 29, 2013, Magistrate Judge David R. Grand issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff David John Moraniec's motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commissioner
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge. At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on August 26, 2013 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court On May 29, 2013, Magistrate Judge David R. Grand issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff David John Moraniec's motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commissioner ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge.
At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on August 26, 2013
PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court
On May 29, 2013, Magistrate Judge David R. Grand issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff David John Moraniec's motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's motion for summary judgment.1 No objections have been filed to the R & R. Upon reviewing the R & R, the parties' underlying cross-motions for summary judgment, and the record as a whole, the Court fully concurs in the thorough analysis of the Magistrate Judge, and adopts the R & R in its entirety.
Accordingly,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's May 29, 2013 Report and Recommendation (docket #20) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the R & R, that Plaintiff's December 5, 2012 motion for summary judgment (docket #14) is DENIED, and that Defendant's February 28, 2013 motion for summary judgment (docket #17) is GRANTED.
