PARKER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 12-cv-12485. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20130830a29
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 29, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2013
Summary: ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Dkt. No. 15); (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 11); (3) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 14); and (4) REMANDING THE FINDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub's Report and Recommendation to grant in part and deny in part Plain
Summary: ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Dkt. No. 15); (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 11); (3) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 14); and (4) REMANDING THE FINDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub's Report and Recommendation to grant in part and deny in part Plaint..
More
ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Dkt. No. 15); (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 11); (3) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 14); and (4) REMANDING THE FINDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub's Report and Recommendation to grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, deny Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and to remand this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) so that the Administrative Law Judge can articulate his reasoning to make clear to Plaintiff and to any subsequent reviewers the weight given to Plaintiff's statements and the reasons for that weight. (Dkt. No. 15.) The parties were served with the report and recommendation on June 24, 2013.
Having reviewed the report and recommendation, and there being no timely objections from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, DENIES Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and REMANDS the findings of the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
