TUCKER v. PENTRICH, 09-13246. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20130911919
Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2013
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [55], DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [47], AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [30] NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [55]. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and the pleadings, including the Report and Recommendation and Plaintiff's objection
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [55], DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [47], AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [30] NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [55]. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and the pleadings, including the Report and Recommendation and Plaintiff's objections..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [55], DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [47], AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [30]
NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [55]. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and the pleadings, including the Report and Recommendation and Plaintiff's objections, the Court hereby ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [47] is DENIED, and Defendants' motion for summary judgment [30] is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART. Specifically, Defendants' motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claim of retaliation in connection with the issuance of misconduct tickets, and DENIED as to Plaintiff's remaining claims of excessive force, assault and battery, and retaliation.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
