DOE 1 v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 13-14356. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20140317a89
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2014
Summary: ORDER SETTING MOTION DEADLINES ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge. Following a motion by Defendants, the court held an off-the-record telephonic status conference with counsel for the parties on March 13, 2014. The court discussed with the parties their inability to reach an agreement on: (1) proposed parameters for interviewing putative class members and prisoner witnesses; (2) a proposed protective order sealing Plaintiffs' identities; and (3) a Rule 26(f) plan that has yet to be submitted. T
Summary: ORDER SETTING MOTION DEADLINES ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge. Following a motion by Defendants, the court held an off-the-record telephonic status conference with counsel for the parties on March 13, 2014. The court discussed with the parties their inability to reach an agreement on: (1) proposed parameters for interviewing putative class members and prisoner witnesses; (2) a proposed protective order sealing Plaintiffs' identities; and (3) a Rule 26(f) plan that has yet to be submitted. Th..
More
ORDER SETTING MOTION DEADLINES
ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.
Following a motion by Defendants, the court held an off-the-record telephonic status conference with counsel for the parties on March 13, 2014. The court discussed with the parties their inability to reach an agreement on: (1) proposed parameters for interviewing putative class members and prisoner witnesses; (2) a proposed protective order sealing Plaintiffs' identities; and (3) a Rule 26(f) plan that has yet to be submitted. The court noted that the parties seem to be unable to come to an agreement on all three points, and that motion practice will be necessary in order to move the case forward. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs will file a motion for a protective order regarding parameters for interviewing putative class members and prisoner witnesses by March 28, 2014. Defendants' response is due by April 4, 2014.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants will file a motion for a more definite statement by March 28, 2014. Plaintiffs' response is due by April 4, 2014.
Source: Leagle
