DAVID v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 13-cv-11999. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20140530c81
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 29, 2014
Latest Update: May 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (#13), DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#8) AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#12) GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Angelique David's claim for judicial review of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. The matter was referred to Magistrate
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (#13), DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#8) AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#12) GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Angelique David's claim for judicial review of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. The matter was referred to Magistrate ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (#13), DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#8) AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#12)
GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Angelique David's claim for judicial review of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand, who issued a Report and Recommendation on April 28, 2014, recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and affirm the decision of the Administrative Law Judge pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing objections has expired. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Upon review of the parties' briefing and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusion. Therefore, the Court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Grand's April 28, 2014 Report and Recommendation [#13] as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [#12] is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [#8] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
