SETTE v. PROFESSIONAL FINANCE COMPANY, INC., 13-cv-13266. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20140603b19
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on June 02, 2014 PRESENT:Honorable Gerald E. Rosen United States District Chief Judge GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge. On March 3, 2014, Defendant Professional Finance Company, Inc. filed with the Court and served upon Plaintiff a Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment moving for dismissal of Plaintiff's Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Complaint in its entirety. Plaintiff failed to r
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on June 02, 2014 PRESENT:Honorable Gerald E. Rosen United States District Chief Judge GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge. On March 3, 2014, Defendant Professional Finance Company, Inc. filed with the Court and served upon Plaintiff a Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment moving for dismissal of Plaintiff's Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Complaint in its entirety. Plaintiff failed to re..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on June 02, 2014
PRESENT:Honorable Gerald E. Rosen United States District Chief Judge
GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge.
On March 3, 2014, Defendant Professional Finance Company, Inc. filed with the Court and served upon Plaintiff a Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment moving for dismissal of Plaintiff's Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Complaint in its entirety. Plaintiff failed to respond to the Motion. Therefore, on May 2, 2014, the court issued an "Order Requiring Response," directing Plaintiff Sean Sette to file a response on or before May 15, 2014. [See Dkt. # 14.] In that Order, the Court further ordered that "plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this matter."
As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed a response. Therefore, pursuant to the Court's May 2, 2014 Order,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED, in its entirety, with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
