ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

SEAN F. COX, District Judge.

On July 12, 2013, Plaintiff Christina Haudek ("Plaintiff") filed this Social Security Disability appeal pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 405(g). (Doc. #1) A summons for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security ("CSS") was issued on July 22, 2013 (Doc. #5). Although 120 days have lapsed since the summons was issued, Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service showing that proper service has been effectuated upon CSS.

On November 21, 2013, Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen issued an Order for Plaintiff to Show Cause why her action should not be dismissed for failure to effectuate service. (Doc. #6). Plaintiff has failed to respond to Magistrate Judge Whalen's show cause order, and the time for doing so has passed. Thus, on June 12, 2014, Magistrate Judge Whalen issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that this Court dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff's action for failure to timely serve Defendant with process. (June 12, 2014 R&R, Doc. #7 at p. 2-3).

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a matter by a Magistrate Judge must file objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the R&R. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2). "The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Furthermore, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Therefore, the Court hereby ADOPTS the June 12, 2014 R&R. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.