Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ANDREWS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 12-13111. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20140801h67 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 34) AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S PETITION FOR ATTORNEY FEES (Doc. 28) AVERN COHN, District Judge. I. This is a social security case. Plaintiff Vonda L. Andrews appealed from the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that she is not disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance benefits. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. Plaintiff and the Commissioner filed cr
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 34) AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S PETITION FOR ATTORNEY FEES (Doc. 28)

AVERN COHN, District Judge.

I.

This is a social security case. Plaintiff Vonda L. Andrews appealed from the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that she is not disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance benefits. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. Plaintiff and the Commissioner filed cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff requested that the Commissioner's decision be reversed and benefits awarded, or that the matter be remanded for further proceedings. The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation (MJRR), recommending that plaintiff's motion be granted as to a remand and the Commissioner's motion be denied. (Doc. 16). Neither party objected. The Court adopted the MJRR and remanded the matter to the Administrative Law Judge. (Doc. 17).

Thereafter, plaintiff's counsel filed a petition for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). (Doc. 19). The magistrate judge granted in part and denied in part the motion, and awarded plaintiff's counsel $4,312.30. (Doc. 24).

Plaintiff prevailed on remand and was awarded $51,951.00 in past-due benefits. Plaintiff's counsel then filed a second petition for attorney fees, seeking $12,987.75 which is 25% of plaintiff's past-due benefit award. (Doc. 28). Plaintiff's counsel also indicated he would return to plaintiff the EAJA fee previously awarded. The magistrate judge recommends that the petition be granted. (Doc. 34).

II.

Neither party has filed objections to the MJRR and the time for filing objections has passed. The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir.1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the motions. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

The Court agrees with the magistrate judge. Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff's counsel's petition for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's counsel is awarded $12,987.75, provided plaintiff's counsel refund to plaintiff the amount previously awarded under the EAJA ($4,312.50).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer