Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MacARTHUR v. CURTIN, 13-CV-11307. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20140801h91 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S HABEAS CORPUS ACTION GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge. At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on July 31, 2014. PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court This matter having come before the Court on the March 27, 2014 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives recommending that the Court deny Plainti
More

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S HABEAS CORPUS ACTION

GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge.

At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on July 31, 2014.

PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court

This matter having come before the Court on the March 27, 2014 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff's petition for a writ of habeas corpus and that this case, accordingly, be dismissed; and no timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation having been filed; and the Court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Court's file of this action and having concluded that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's petition for habeas corpus relief should be denied; and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation of March 27, 2014 [Dkt. # 16] be, and hereby is, adopted by this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's petition for habeas corpus relief Dkt. # 1] be, and hereby is DENIED and the above-captioned case, therefore, is DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that leave to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer