STOMBERSKI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 13-11743. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20140818d03
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on August 15, 2014 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge. On June 27, 2014, Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff Robert Stomberski's motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commissio
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on August 15, 2014 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge. On June 27, 2014, Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff Robert Stomberski's motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commission..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on August 15, 2014
PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court
GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge.
On June 27, 2014, Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff Robert Stomberski's motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed to the R & R.1 Upon reviewing the R & R, the parties' underlying cross-motions for summary judgment, and the record as a whole, the Court fully concurs in the analysis of the Magistrate Judge, and adopts the R & R in its entirety.
Accordingly,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's June 27, 2014 Report and Recommendation (docket #19) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the R & R, that Plaintiff's July 28, 2013 motion for summary judgment (docket #8) is DENIED, and that Defendant's October 30, 2013 motion for summary judgment (docket #13) is GRANTED.
FootNotes
1. As noted by the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Plaintiff was permitted to withdraw from representing Plaintiff following an April 17, 2014 hearing. (See R & R at 1-2 n.1.) Plaintiff has not secured substitute counsel, whether before or after the Magistrate Judge issued the June 27, 2014 R & R. Neither has Plaintiff filed objections to the R & R on his own behalf.
Source: Leagle
