VOCK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 13-12753. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20140825898
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [#15], GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#10], DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#13], AND REMANDING CASE UNDER SENTENCE FOUR GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Rita Vock's claim for judicial review of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental se
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [#15], GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#10], DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#13], AND REMANDING CASE UNDER SENTENCE FOUR GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Rita Vock's claim for judicial review of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental sec..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [#15], GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#10], DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#13], AND REMANDING CASE UNDER SENTENCE FOUR
GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Rita Vock's claim for judicial review of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk who issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") on July 24, 2014 recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied, and the Commissioner's findings and conclusions be reversed.
Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's R&R, and the time for filing objections has expired. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Upon review of the parties' briefing and the Magistrate Judge's R & R, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusion. Therefore, the Court ACCEPTS Magistrate Hluchaniuk's R&R, GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [#10], and DENIES Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [#13]. The Commissioner's findings and conclusions are REVERSED, and the Court REMANDS the case under Sentence Four.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
