SPEARS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 13-13905. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20141202a86
Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 01, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2014
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER: (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 22); (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 15); AND (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 19) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. On September 29, 2014, Magistrate Judge Charles Binder issued a Report and Recommendation addressing the outstanding motions in this action. (ECF No. 22). In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this Cour
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER: (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 22); (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 15); AND (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 19) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. On September 29, 2014, Magistrate Judge Charles Binder issued a Report and Recommendation addressing the outstanding motions in this action. (ECF No. 22). In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court..
More
OPINION AND ORDER: (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 22); (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 15); AND (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 19)
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
On September 29, 2014, Magistrate Judge Charles Binder issued a Report and Recommendation addressing the outstanding motions in this action. (ECF No. 22). In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court deny Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 15) and grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and there being no timely objections filed to the report pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court will adopt the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.
Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22), GRANTS Defendant Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 19), DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15), and DISMISSES this action with PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
