SHTYLLAKU v. U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT, 13-14601. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20150202839
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2015
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 29); AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 9) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk's Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 9, Report and Recommendation). Plaintiffs did not file an objection to the Report and Recommendation. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and t
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 29); AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 9) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk's Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 9, Report and Recommendation). Plaintiffs did not file an objection to the Report and Recommendation. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and th..
More
OPINION AND ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 29); AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 9)
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk's Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 9, Report and Recommendation). Plaintiffs did not file an objection to the Report and Recommendation.
Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and there being no timely objections from any party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(b), the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 29); GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9); and DISMISSES the Complaint with PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
