Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BADALAMENTI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 13-14108. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20150302918 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SEAN F. COX , District Judge . Plaintiff brought this action challenging the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's claim for Disability Insurance Benefits. Thereafter, the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris for determination of all non-dispositive motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Report and Recommendation pursuant to 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. In a Report
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff brought this action challenging the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's claim for Disability Insurance Benefits. Thereafter, the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris for determination of all non-dispositive motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Report and Recommendation pursuant to § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C).

The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. In a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") issued on February 9, 2015, Magistrate Judge Morris recommends that: 1) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED; and 2) that the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED.

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the R&R. "The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the magistrate judge's disposition to which specific written objection has been made." Id.

The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither party has filed objections to the R&R. The Court hereby ADOPTS the February 9, 2015 R&R.

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer