DOLINSKI v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 14-13273. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20150515d34
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 14, 2015
Latest Update: May 14, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING 4/21/15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SEAN F. COX , District Judge . Plaintiffs filed this action asserting claims against Defendant. On September 26, 2014, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss. That motion was referred to Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk for a Report and Recommendation. On April 21, 2015, Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 13) wherein he recommends that the Motion to Dismiss be granted and Plaintiffs' complaint b
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING 4/21/15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SEAN F. COX , District Judge . Plaintiffs filed this action asserting claims against Defendant. On September 26, 2014, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss. That motion was referred to Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk for a Report and Recommendation. On April 21, 2015, Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 13) wherein he recommends that the Motion to Dismiss be granted and Plaintiffs' complaint be..
More
ORDER ADOPTING 4/21/15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
SEAN F. COX, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed this action asserting claims against Defendant. On September 26, 2014, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss. That motion was referred to Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk for a Report and Recommendation.
On April 21, 2015, Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 13) wherein he recommends that the Motion to Dismiss be granted and Plaintiffs' complaint be dismissed.
Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the R&R. "The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the magistrate judge's disposition to which specific written objection has been made." Id.
The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither party has filed objections to the R&R. The Court hereby ADOPTS the April 21, 2015 R&R.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
