Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

JOHNSON v. STODDARD, 14-cv-14770. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20151015a55 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2015
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER (1) GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR NON-PREJUDICIAL DISMISSAL (Dkt. 15); (2) DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Dkt. 1); AND (3) DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY MARK A. GOLDSMITH , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's motion to voluntarily dismiss his pending petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. 15), so that he may return to the state courts to pursue further challenges to his state criminal pro
More

OPINION AND ORDER (1) GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR NON-PREJUDICIAL DISMISSAL (Dkt. 15); (2) DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Dkt. 1); AND (3) DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's motion to voluntarily dismiss his pending petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. 15), so that he may return to the state courts to pursue further challenges to his state criminal proceedings. The Court previously denied Petitioner's motion to stay the proceedings and hold this case in abeyance. See 9/10/2015 Order (Dkt. 14). Given that Petitioner seeks to exhaust additional issues in the state courts, and given that he has sufficient time to do so within the one-year statute of limitations applicable to federal habeas actions, dismissal of the present petition is appropriate.

Accordingly, the Court grants Petitioner's motion for non-prejudicial dismissal (Dkt. 15), and dismisses the petition for a writ of habeas corpus without prejudice. Additionally, the Court denies a certificate of appealability, as reasonable jurists could not debate the correctness of the Court's procedural ruling. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-485 (2000). This case is closed. Should Petitioner wish to seek federal habeas relief following the exhaustion of state court remedies, he must file a new habeas petition in federal court within the time remaining on the one-year period of limitations.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer