Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HARE v. INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS, 15-12043. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20151123946 Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND ORDERING THE PLAINTIFF TO FIND REPLACEMENT COUNSEL WITHIN THIRTY DAYS DAVID M. LAWSON , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on attorney Mandel I. Allweil's motion to withdraw as counsel of record in this putative class action. It appears that there is a disagreement between Mr. Hare, the named plaintiff, and Mr. Allweil as to the manner in which to proceed in this case. The Court heard oral argument on November 19, 2015 and has reviewed th
More

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND ORDERING THE PLAINTIFF TO FIND REPLACEMENT COUNSEL WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

This matter is before the Court on attorney Mandel I. Allweil's motion to withdraw as counsel of record in this putative class action. It appears that there is a disagreement between Mr. Hare, the named plaintiff, and Mr. Allweil as to the manner in which to proceed in this case. The Court heard oral argument on November 19, 2015 and has reviewed the motion and finds that attorney Allweil has shown good grounds for the Court to allow his withdrawal. The Court therefore will grant attorney Allweil's motion.

However, the plaintiff is now without counsel. Mr. Hare cannot proceed pro se on behalf of a putative class action "[b]ecause, by definition, pro se means to appear on one's own behalf, a person may not appear pro se on another person's behalf in the other's cause of action." Cavanaugh ex rel. Cavanaugh v. Cardinal Local Sch. Dist., 409 F.3d 753, 755 (6th Cir. 2005), abrogated on other grounds by Winkelman ex rel. Winkelman v. Parma City. Sch. Dist., 550 U.S. 516, 127 (2007); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1654 ("In all courts of the United States the parties may plead and conduct their own cases personally or by counsel as, by the rules of such courts, respectively, are permitted to manage and conduct causes therein.") (emphasis added).

Mr. Hare, of course, can pursue his claims on his own behalf, but thus far this case has been presented as a putative class action. If Mr. Hare wishes to continue pursuing this case with the intention of certifying a class, he must obtain counsel. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g). Mr. Hare is not an attorney and therefore cannot represent a class as a pro se litigant. Therefore, the Court will allow the plaintiff thirty days to find suitable counsel to appear in this case or elect to proceed on an individual basis. If no new counsel appears for the plaintiff, or Mr. Hare does not file an amended complaint deleting the class references, the case will be dismissed without prejudice.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that attorney Mandel I. Allweil's motion to withdraw as counsel of record for the plaintiff [dkt. #19] is GRANTED. The appearance of attorney Allweil as counsel of record for the plaintiff is WITHDRAWN, and attorney Allweil is relieved of any further responsibility to the Court in this matter.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff must find suitable counsel to represent him and the class in this case or the case will be dismissed without prejudice. The attorney must file an appearance with the Court on or before December 21, 2015.

It is further ORDERED that motion hearing set for December 8, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. is adjourned until further notice of the Court.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer