Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

THODE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 15-10988. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20151215a77 Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING 11/24/15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SEAN F. COX , District Judge . Plaintiff filed this action under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), challenging a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits under the Social Security Act. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge David Grand for determination of all non-dispositive motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Report and Recommendation pursuant to 636(b)(1)(B) and (C
More

ORDER ADOPTING 11/24/15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits under the Social Security Act. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge David Grand for determination of all non-dispositive motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Report and Recommendation pursuant to § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). Thereafter, the parties filed motions for summary judgment.

On November 24, 2015, Magistrate Judge Grand issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Docket Entry No. 11) wherein he recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and affirm the Commissioner's decision.

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the R&R. "The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the magistrate judge's disposition to which specific written objection has been made." Id.

The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither party has filed objections to the R&R. The Court hereby ADOPTS the November 24, 2015 R&R.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer