TAYLOR v. HAAS, 15-CV-12433-DT. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20160115j15
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2016
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROBERT H. CLELAND , District Judge . This matter was referred to United States Magistrate David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his report filed on December 30, 2015, the magistrate judge recommended that this court grant the Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. # 23], Dismiss the Complaint without prejudice and deny as moot MDOC's Motion for Summary Judgement [Dkt. # 17]. A consent to the volun
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROBERT H. CLELAND , District Judge . This matter was referred to United States Magistrate David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his report filed on December 30, 2015, the magistrate judge recommended that this court grant the Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. # 23], Dismiss the Complaint without prejudice and deny as moot MDOC's Motion for Summary Judgement [Dkt. # 17]. A consent to the volunt..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his report filed on December 30, 2015, the magistrate judge recommended that this court grant the Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. # 23], Dismiss the Complaint without prejudice and deny as moot MDOC's Motion for Summary Judgement [Dkt. # 17]. A consent to the voluntary dismissal was filed by the MDOC Defendants on December 28, 2015. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1
Having reviewed the file and the report, the court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this Order.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's "Report and Recommendation", Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt.# 23] is GRANTED, the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 17] is DENIED AS MOOT.
FootNotes
1. The failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the court from its duty to independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
Source: Leagle
