ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.
The United States filed an Unopposed Application for Entry of Preliminary Order of Forfeiture ("Application") seeking a forfeiture order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963(a)(1)-(3), for (a) any and all interest JOHN RENNY RIEDE ("Defendant") has acquired or maintained in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962; (b) any and all interest in, security of, claim against, or property or contractual right of any kind affording a source of influence over any Enterprise named and described in Count One of the Third Superseding Indictment which Defendant established, operated, controlled, conducted or participated in the conduct of, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962; and (c) any and all property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from racketeering activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962, including the following:
(hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property").
The government represented in its Application that it does not intend to seek forfeiture of, and will not seek to forfeit, the real property located at 114 North Van Buren, Bay City, MI based upon the criminal activity and facts set forth in the Third Superseding Indictment filed in this criminal case.
Based upon the information contained in the Application, the contents of the Rule 11 Plea Agreement entered into by Defendant, Defendant's guilty plea to violating 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) as alleged in Count One of the Third Superseding Indictment, Defendant's agreement to forfeit the Subject Property, and other information in the record,
1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1963(a)(1)-(3) and Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.2, Defendant shall forfeit to the United States (a) any and all interest Defendant has acquired or maintained in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962; (b) any and all interest in, security of, claim against, or property or contractual right of any kind affording a source of influence over any Enterprise named and described in Count One of the Third Superseding Indictment which Defendant established, operated, controlled, conducted or participated in the conduct of, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962; and (c) any and all property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from racketeering activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962, including, but not limited to, the Subject Property.
2. The Subject Property
3. The Court has determined, based upon the information and agreements contained in Defendant's Rule 11 plea agreement, and other information in the record, that there is a sufficient nexus between the Subject Property and the violation of Count One alleged in the Third Superseding Indictment in that the Subject Property constitutes an interest acquired or maintained in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), and/or constitutes an interest in, security of, claim against, or property or contractual right affording a source of influence over the Enterprise named and described in Count One of the Third Superseding Indictment which Defendant established, operated, controlled, conducted or participated in the conduct of, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), and/or is property constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from racketeering activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).
4. Based upon its representation in its Application, the government shall not seek to forfeit the real property located at 114 North Van Buren, Bay City, MI based upon the criminal activity and facts set forth in the Third Superseding Indictment filed in this criminal case.
5. This Order shall become final as to Defendant at the time it is entered and the forfeiture shall be made part of Defendant's sentence and included in Defendant's Judgment.
6. Upon entry of this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, the United States Attorney General or his designee is authorized to commence any applicable proceeding to comply with the statutes governing third party rights, including giving notice of this Order.
7. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963(l), the United States shall publish notice of this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture and of its intent to dispose of the Subject Property in such manner as the Attorney General may direct on
8. The United States is hereby authorized, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963(k) and Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 32.2 (c), to conduct any discovery in the ancillary proceeding in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure upon a showing that such discovery is proper and desirable.
9. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963(l)(7), following the Court's disposition of any petitions for ancillary hearing, or, if none, following the expiration of the period provided in 18 U.S.C. § 1963(l)(2) for the filing of third party petitions, the United States shall have clear title to the Subject Property, all other interests in the Subject Property shall be FORFEITED to the United States, this Order shall become the Final Order of Forfeiture as provided by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(c)(2), and the United States shall be authorized to dispose of the Subject Property as prescribed by law.
10. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Order, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(e).