PURDY v. TOPAC EXPRESS, 16-cv-10740. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20160525d06
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 24, 2016
Latest Update: May 24, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' EMERGENCY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [15] MONA K. MAJZOUB , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court on an Emergency Motion for Protective Order filed by Defendants Topac Express and Gurwinder Bains. (Docket no. 15.) Plaintiff Shelly Elizabeth Purdy filed a Response to Defendants' Motion. (Docket no. 17.) The Motion has been referred to the undersigned for consideration. (Docket no. 16.) On May 23, 2016, at 3:45 p.m., the Court held a telephonic conf
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' EMERGENCY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [15] MONA K. MAJZOUB , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court on an Emergency Motion for Protective Order filed by Defendants Topac Express and Gurwinder Bains. (Docket no. 15.) Plaintiff Shelly Elizabeth Purdy filed a Response to Defendants' Motion. (Docket no. 17.) The Motion has been referred to the undersigned for consideration. (Docket no. 16.) On May 23, 2016, at 3:45 p.m., the Court held a telephonic confe..
More
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' EMERGENCY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [15]
MONA K. MAJZOUB, Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on an Emergency Motion for Protective Order filed by Defendants Topac Express and Gurwinder Bains. (Docket no. 15.) Plaintiff Shelly Elizabeth Purdy filed a Response to Defendants' Motion. (Docket no. 17.) The Motion has been referred to the undersigned for consideration. (Docket no. 16.) On May 23, 2016, at 3:45 p.m., the Court held a telephonic conference regarding Defendants' Motion. Having considered the parties' arguments as presented in the pleadings and in the telephonic conference, IT IS ORDERED that:
1) Defendants' Emergency Motion for Protective Order [15] is DENIED;
2) The depositions of Gurwinder Bains and Bruce McKay will be re-noticed at a mutually convenient date, time, and place and completed by June 27, 2016; and
3) Plaintiff will pay the reasonable expenses and attorney's fees incurred by Defendants as a result of the adjournment of the May 26, 2016 depositions. Defendants will submit to the Court a Bill of Costs itemizing the same by June 3, 2016, at which time the Court will determine the amount of costs and fees for which Plaintiff is liable.
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), the parties have a period of fourteen days from the date of this Order within which to file any written appeal to the District Judge as may be permissible under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Source: Leagle
