U.S. v. SHY, 15-CR-20652-13. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20160701e96
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER STRIKING PRO SE MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. 233] GEORGE CARAM STEEH , District Judge . Defendant Arlandis Shy, II, although represented by counsel, has filed a pro se motion to dismiss due to an alleged violation of the Speedy Trial Act. A person's right to appear pro se or by counsel is disjunctive, and a person in a criminal matter has no right, constitutional or otherwise, to "hybrid representation" that results in simultaneous self-representation and representation by counsel. 28
Summary: ORDER STRIKING PRO SE MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. 233] GEORGE CARAM STEEH , District Judge . Defendant Arlandis Shy, II, although represented by counsel, has filed a pro se motion to dismiss due to an alleged violation of the Speedy Trial Act. A person's right to appear pro se or by counsel is disjunctive, and a person in a criminal matter has no right, constitutional or otherwise, to "hybrid representation" that results in simultaneous self-representation and representation by counsel. 28 U..
More
ORDER STRIKING PRO SE MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. 233]
GEORGE CARAM STEEH, District Judge.
Defendant Arlandis Shy, II, although represented by counsel, has filed a pro se motion to dismiss due to an alleged violation of the Speedy Trial Act. A person's right to appear pro se or by counsel is disjunctive, and a person in a criminal matter has no right, constitutional or otherwise, to "hybrid representation" that results in simultaneous self-representation and representation by counsel. 28 U.S.C. § 1654; United States v. Mosely, 810 F.2d 93, 97-98 (6th Cir. 1987). Mr. Shy informed the court on the record that it was his desire that his attorney, Carl Jordan, remain on his case. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk hereby STRIKE defendant's pro se motion [doc. 223].
Source: Leagle
