Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McCurry v. Colvin, 14-12114. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20160930e67 Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR SECTION 406(b) ATTORNEY FEES (DOC. 25) DENISE PAGE HOOD , Chief District Judge . Petitioner, Thomas J. Bertino, counsel for Plaintiff, seeks attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 406(b) of the Social Security Act. Petitioner requests $8,798.13, which is the full amount of potential attorney fees the Social Security Administration withheld from Geraldine McCurry's benefits award. McCurry, through a stipulation and
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR SECTION 406(b) ATTORNEY FEES (DOC. 25)

Petitioner, Thomas J. Bertino, counsel for Plaintiff, seeks attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act. Petitioner requests $8,798.13, which is the full amount of potential attorney fees the Social Security Administration withheld from Geraldine McCurry's benefits award. McCurry, through a stipulation and order, has received $4,332.79 in attorney fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412, the Equal Access to the Justice Act ("EAJA"). Therefore, if Petitioner's motion is granted, he must repay McCurry the $4,332.79 she received under the EAJA. The Commissioner does not oppose the amount Petitioner seeks.

The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant Petitioner's motion, noting that Petitioner demonstrated that the amount he seeks is reasonable. (Doc. 25 at 2). The Magistrate Judge also states that Petitioner's request for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. §§ 406(a) and 406(b) is not completely restricted by the 25% cap under §406(b)(1)(A). Each tribunal may award attorney fees to an attorney for the work that the attorney has done within that tribunal. Accordingly, the Petitioner may seek additional attorney fees, subject to the restrictions 42 U.S.C. § 406(a)(2)(A), for work done before the Commissioner without regard to the cap. (Doc. 25 at 4).

Once a report and recommendation has been issued, a party has fourteen days to file written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636. A district court is not required to review any portion of a report and recommendation to which no objection was made. Hickey-Niezgoda v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, No. 11-10538, 2012 WL 1079573, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 30, 2012) citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Neither party filed any written objections, and the time period for filing objections has expired. After reviewing the motion for summary judgment, the Report and Recommendation, and the remainder of the record, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations. She engaged in a thorough analysis of the issues presented and provided reasoned explanations for her conclusions.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 25) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Attorney Fees (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED. Petitioner is awarded $8,798.13 in attorney's fees. Petitioner must refund Plaintiff $4,332.79, the amount previously awarded under the EAJA.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer