INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL, IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA v. TRW AUTOMOTIVE U.S., LLC, 11-CV-14630. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20161003c47
Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES (Docket # 41) DENISE PAGE HOOD , Chief District Judge . Defendant, TRW Automotive U.S. LLC (TRW), filed this Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses seeking to strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Brief filed without permission of the Court citing, L.R. 7.1. Defendant also argues that Plaintiffs' Supplementa
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES (Docket # 41) DENISE PAGE HOOD , Chief District Judge . Defendant, TRW Automotive U.S. LLC (TRW), filed this Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses seeking to strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Brief filed without permission of the Court citing, L.R. 7.1. Defendant also argues that Plaintiffs' Supplemental..
More
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES (Docket # 41)
DENISE PAGE HOOD, Chief District Judge.
Defendant, TRW Automotive U.S. LLC (TRW), filed this Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses seeking to strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Brief filed without permission of the Court citing, L.R. 7.1. Defendant also argues that Plaintiffs' Supplemental Brief is untimely under L.R. 54.1.2. Defendant, in the alternative, requests permission to file a reply memorandum instanter. Plaintiffs, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) and Martin Lamer, John Yasso, Kim Taskila, and Ronald Gardner (UAW), filed a response claiming Defendant had not complied with L.R. 7.1. In its discretion and because the Court finds that further briefing is not necessary to its decision, the Defendant's Motion to Strike (Docket #41) is GRANTED.
ITS IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Attorney Fees and Expenses (Docket #41) is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
