Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WESTBORN PHYSICAL THERAPY, LLC v. ESURANCE INSURANCE CO., 16-13940. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20161227b94 Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER GEORGE CARAM STEEH , District Judge . This matter came before the court on the Rule 16 scheduling conference, held December 20, 2016. This case was removed from Wayne County Circuit Court by defendant Esurance Insurance Co. on November 7, 2016, after more than eight months of litigation in state court. The plaintiffs oppose any further discovery inasmuch as the case in state court was well past the discovery cut-off by the time it was removed. In addition, defendant's summary disposit
More

ORDER

This matter came before the court on the Rule 16 scheduling conference, held December 20, 2016. This case was removed from Wayne County Circuit Court by defendant Esurance Insurance Co. on November 7, 2016, after more than eight months of litigation in state court. The plaintiffs oppose any further discovery inasmuch as the case in state court was well past the discovery cut-off by the time it was removed. In addition, defendant's summary disposition motion had been heard and denied. Plaintiffs complain that, at best, defendant is seeking to relitigate the entire case after participating in the state court right up to the eve of trial in that forum. Intervening plaintiffs' counsel, Mr. Bloomberg, opined that the case is not worth in excess of $75,000. Given that at least one intervening plaintiff has claims totaling only about $16,000, and others are likewise very limited in damages, the court was asked to limit or bar discovery and motion practice in order to effectively address what plaintiffs believe are abusive litigation tactics employed thus far by defendant.

Accordingly, the court indicated at the conference that it would allow discovery for a period of 45 days, limited to permit defendant to depose plaintiff's accountant and to seek tax returns. Plaintiffs may depose defendant's claims adjuster during the same period if they wish. Discovery addressed in the state court proceeding shall be permitted full use in this case.

After the conference, counsel for the parties discussed a possible agreement to remand with a cap on damages of $75,000. The court's allowance of discovery in this case shall not preclude potential sanctions if evidence of an abusive litigation strategy by defendants is presented to the court.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer