REINER v. SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY, 16-11728. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20170522858
Visitors: 20
Filed: May 19, 2017
Latest Update: May 19, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY AND THE BOARD OF CONTROL OF SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS PAUL D. BORMAN , District Judge . Plaintiff TC Reiner brought this copyright infringement lawsuit on May 16, 2016 (ECF No. 1), and filed an Amended Complaint in the action on November 9, 2016 (ECF No. 16). Now before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Saginaw Valley State University (" SVSU ") and Defendant Board of Control of Saginaw Va
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY AND THE BOARD OF CONTROL OF SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS PAUL D. BORMAN , District Judge . Plaintiff TC Reiner brought this copyright infringement lawsuit on May 16, 2016 (ECF No. 1), and filed an Amended Complaint in the action on November 9, 2016 (ECF No. 16). Now before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Saginaw Valley State University (" SVSU ") and Defendant Board of Control of Saginaw Val..
More
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY AND THE BOARD OF CONTROL OF SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff TC Reiner brought this copyright infringement lawsuit on May 16, 2016 (ECF No. 1), and filed an Amended Complaint in the action on November 9, 2016 (ECF No. 16). Now before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Saginaw Valley State University ("SVSU") and Defendant Board of Control of Saginaw Valley State University ("SVSU Board") on November 14, 2016. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff responded on November 22, 2016 (ECF No. 19), and Defendants SVSU and SVSU Board replied on December 2, 2016 (ECF No. 20).
A hearing on the Motion was held on May 19, 2017. At the hearing, the parties agreed on the record that SVSU and SVSU Board should be dismissed as Defendants in this action.
Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants SVSU and SVSU Board's Motion, and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE all claims asserted against SVSU and SVSU Board in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
