Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

LEAF v. REFN, 16-12149. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20170621e43 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING NICHOLAS REFN'S MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. #34] AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. #31] VICTORIA A. ROBERTS , District Judge . Martin Leaf ("Leaf") filed a Complaint against Nicolas Winding Refn ("Refn"), Bold Films Inc., Albert Brooks, John Palermo, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Netflix Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Apple Inc., Google Inc., American Multi-Cinema Inc., and Marc Platt Productions, Inc. (collectively "Defendants"). On June 20, 2017, the Court held a h
More

ORDER GRANTING NICHOLAS REFN'S MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. #34] AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. #31]

Martin Leaf ("Leaf") filed a Complaint against Nicolas Winding Refn ("Refn"), Bold Films Inc., Albert Brooks, John Palermo, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Netflix Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Apple Inc., Google Inc., American Multi-Cinema Inc., and Marc Platt Productions, Inc. (collectively "Defendants").

On June 20, 2017, the Court held a hearing on Refn's Motion to Dismiss Leaf's Complaint for insufficient service of process [Doc. 34] and Defendants' motion to dismiss Leaf's First Amended Complaint [Doc. 31].

Attending were Martin Leaf and Samuel Gunn representing the Plaintiff and Harrison J. Dossick representing Defendants, James E. Stewart representing all Defendants except Apple Inc., Brian Michael Willen representing Google Inc., and, Jessica A. Sprovtsoff representing Apple Inc.

For the reason stated on the record, Nicholas Refn's motion to dismiss for improper service is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE and Defendants' motion to dismiss Martin Leaf's First Amended Complaint is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer