COMERICA BANK v. ENAGIC CO., LTD., 17-11131. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20170823a08
Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Doc. 34) AND CHARTING THE COURSE OF THE CASE AVERN COHN , District Judge . This is a trademark case. Before the Court is defendants Enagic Co. Ltd. (Enagic Japan) and Enagic USA, Inc. (Enagic USA) motion to strike plaintiff's request for attorney fees and for leave to file a surreply
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Doc. 34) AND CHARTING THE COURSE OF THE CASE AVERN COHN , District Judge . This is a trademark case. Before the Court is defendants Enagic Co. Ltd. (Enagic Japan) and Enagic USA, Inc. (Enagic USA) motion to strike plaintiff's request for attorney fees and for leave to file a surreply ..
More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Doc. 34) AND CHARTING THE COURSE OF THE CASE
AVERN COHN, District Judge.
This is a trademark case. Before the Court is defendants Enagic Co. Ltd. (Enagic Japan) and Enagic USA, Inc. (Enagic USA) motion to strike plaintiff's request for attorney fees and for leave to file a surreply brief. (Doc. 34) The motion to strike is DENIED. The request to file a surreply brief is GRANTED.
Also pending before the Court are (1) Comerica's motion for a preliminary injunction, (Doc. 7), (2) Enagic Japan's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (Doc. 16) and (3) Enagic USA's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Doc. 21).
Enagic's motions will be decided on the briefs.
As to Comerica's motion, if the case survives, in whole or in part, after resolution of Enagic's motions, the hearing will be for a permanent injunction given the length of time that has passed since the filing of the complaint. The Court will also consider bifurcating liability and damages at such time.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
