MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, District Judge.
In this action, Plaintiffs Bobby and Sharon Marshall challenge Defendant Allstate Insurance Company's denial of an insurance claim they filed. (See Compl., ECF #1-1.) The Marshalls' claim relates to a water loss that occurred at their premises located at 9269 Pinehurst, Detroit, Michigan, on or about January 24, 2016. Third-party Mary Moses was a tenant at the Pinehurst premises at the time of the loss. Her granddaughter, Share Moses, has been identified "as the individual who discovered the loss." (ECF #11 at Pg. ID 121.)
The parties are now engaged in discovery. On July 29, 2017, a process server for Allstate personally served Mary Moses with (1) a Notice of Taking Deposition and Subpoena, (2) a check in the amount of the witness fee required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and (3) an enclosure letter. (See ECF ## 10-1 — 10-5.) The enclosure letter explained to Mary Moses that the subpoena "compel[ed] [her] attendance" at a deposition on August 17, 2017, at 11:00 a.m. (ECF #10-4 at Pg. ID 105.) After she was served with the subpoena, Mary Moses cashed the witness fee check. (See ECF #10-5.)
A process server also personally served Share Moses with a subpoena for her deposition and a check for the applicable witness fee. (See ECF ## 11-2 — 11-5.) Despite cashing the witness fee check (see ECF #11-5), Share Moses cancelled her originally scheduled deposition date and has not appeared at three rescheduled deposition dates. (See ECF #11 at Pg. ID 122.)
On August 17, 2017, at 11:00 a.m., counsel for all parties appeared for Mary Moses' scheduled deposition. Mary Moses, however, did not appear as required. (See Deposition Transcript, ECF #10-6.) At 11:33 a.m., with Mary Moses having still not appeared, counsel for Allstate concluded the deposition and stated on the record that she would pursue a motion compelling Mary Moses' attendance at a continued deposition. (See id. at Pg. ID 111.)
On August 22, 2017, Allstate filed a motion for an order to show cause with respect to Mary Moses. (See ECF #10.) On August 23, 2017, Allstate filed a similar motion with respect to Share Moses. (See ECF #11.) In the motions, Allstate asks the Court to enter an order "directing Mary Moses [and Share Moses] to show cause why [they] should not be held in contempt of court for failing to appear for [their]. . . . Deposition[s]." (ECF #10 at Pg. ID 86-87; ECF #11 at Pg. ID 123.) Counsel for the Marshalls do not oppose the entry of such an order. (See ECF #10 at Pg. ID 87; ECF #11 at Pg. ID 115.)
Accordingly,