Donald v. Commissioner of Social Security, 5:16-cv-11303. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20171006r12
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2017
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANTHONY P. PATTI'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [28] ON THE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [22, 25] JUDITH E. LEVY , District Judge . This is a Social Security appeal. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 28) recommending the Court deny plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 22) and grant defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 25), issued July 21, 2017. The parties were required to file specif
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANTHONY P. PATTI'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [28] ON THE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [22, 25] JUDITH E. LEVY , District Judge . This is a Social Security appeal. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 28) recommending the Court deny plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 22) and grant defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 25), issued July 21, 2017. The parties were required to file specifi..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANTHONY P. PATTI'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [28] ON THE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [22, 25]
JUDITH E. LEVY, District Judge.
This is a Social Security appeal. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 28) recommending the Court deny plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 22) and grant defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 25), issued July 21, 2017. The parties were required to file specific written objections within 14 days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless thoroughly reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and concurs in the reasoning and result. Accordingly,
The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 28) is ADOPTED;
Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 22) is DENIED;
Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 25) is GRANTED; and
The findings of the Commissioner are ADOPTED and this case is hereby DISMISSED.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The parties, by failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, have waived any further right of appeal. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
Source: Leagle
