Dorman v. Clinton, Township of, 15-cv-12552. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20171026e21
Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2017
Summary: ORDER ON MOTION HEARING MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . On October 25, 2017, the Court held a hearing on two motions: Plaintiffs' motion to compel certain discovery (ECF #28) and Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF #29). For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: • The motion to compel discovery (ECF #28) is TERMINATED AS MOOT; • The parties shall submit a stipulated order resolving the motion for preliminary injuncti
Summary: ORDER ON MOTION HEARING MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . On October 25, 2017, the Court held a hearing on two motions: Plaintiffs' motion to compel certain discovery (ECF #28) and Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF #29). For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: • The motion to compel discovery (ECF #28) is TERMINATED AS MOOT; • The parties shall submit a stipulated order resolving the motion for preliminary injunctio..
More
ORDER ON MOTION HEARING
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, District Judge.
On October 25, 2017, the Court held a hearing on two motions: Plaintiffs' motion to compel certain discovery (ECF #28) and Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF #29).
For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
• The motion to compel discovery (ECF #28) is TERMINATED AS MOOT;
• The parties shall submit a stipulated order resolving the motion for preliminary injunction (ECF #29) within thirty-days of this order.
Source: Leagle
