Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WOLFE v. Social Security, 16-cv-13620. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20171229911 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2017
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [#19], DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#13], GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#18] AND DISMISSING ACTION GERSHWIN A. DRAIN , District Judge . This matter is before the court on the parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Scott R. Wolfe's claim for judicial review of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplement
More

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [#19], DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#13], GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#18] AND DISMISSING ACTION

This matter is before the court on the parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Scott R. Wolfe's claim for judicial review of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen, who issued a Report and Recommendation on November 26, 2017, recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment.

Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing objections has expired. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Upon review of the parties' briefing and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusion. Therefore, the Court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Whalen's November 26, 2017 Report and Recommendation [#19] as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [#13] is DENIED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [#18] is GRANTED.

This cause of action is dismissed.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer