Davis v. Echo Valley Condominium Association, 17-12475. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20180117a18
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATED ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION DAVID M. LAWSON , District Judge . Based on the stipulation of the parties, It is ORDERED that in the event defendants Moisey Lamnin and Ella Lamnin decide to lease out Unit No. 115 located at 27635 West Echo Valley, Farmington Hills, MI during the pendency of this litigation that they shall include a contractual clause in the lease that shall prohibit smoking by the tenant(s) and guest(s) of the tenant(s). It is further ORDERED that this s
Summary: STIPULATED ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION DAVID M. LAWSON , District Judge . Based on the stipulation of the parties, It is ORDERED that in the event defendants Moisey Lamnin and Ella Lamnin decide to lease out Unit No. 115 located at 27635 West Echo Valley, Farmington Hills, MI during the pendency of this litigation that they shall include a contractual clause in the lease that shall prohibit smoking by the tenant(s) and guest(s) of the tenant(s). It is further ORDERED that this st..
More
STIPULATED ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
Based on the stipulation of the parties,
It is ORDERED that in the event defendants Moisey Lamnin and Ella Lamnin decide to lease out Unit No. 115 located at 27635 West Echo Valley, Farmington Hills, MI during the pendency of this litigation that they shall include a contractual clause in the lease that shall prohibit smoking by the tenant(s) and guest(s) of the tenant(s).
It is further ORDERED that this stipulated order shall not impact the Lamnin defendants' ability to sell and/or encumber the property deed located at 27635 West Echo Valley, Farmington Hills, MI 48334 Unit No. 115.
It is further ORDERED that this stipulated order is not an admission of liability and does not prohibit the Lamnin defendants from presenting any and all possible defenses as to the plaintiff's alleged claims.
It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunction [dkt. #20 and #36] are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
