Davis-Bey v. City of Warren, 16-cv-11707. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20180215c46
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [69] JUDITH E. LEVY , District Judge . On January 16, 2018, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 69) recommending that the Court grant defendants' motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. 43.) The parties were required to file specific written objections within 14 days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless thoroughly reviewed the Report and R
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [69] JUDITH E. LEVY , District Judge . On January 16, 2018, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 69) recommending that the Court grant defendants' motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. 43.) The parties were required to file specific written objections within 14 days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless thoroughly reviewed the Report and Re..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [69]
JUDITH E. LEVY, District Judge.
On January 16, 2018, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 69) recommending that the Court grant defendants' motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. 43.) The parties were required to file specific written objections within 14 days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless thoroughly reviewed the Report and Recommendation.
Plaintiff was arrested for interference with a lawful arrest, and received a trial based on charges stemming from that arrest. The Court adopts the reasoning of the Report and Recommendation insofar as it determines that there is no constitutional right to interfere with a lawful arrest, regardless of whether the person interfering with the arrest is also filming the arrest. The Court otherwise adopts the reasoning and result of the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly,
The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 69) is ADOPTED;
Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 43) is GRANTED; and
This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
