Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sanders v. Michigan Supreme Court, 16-12959. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20180227a20 Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER AMENDING AND CORRECTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [Doc. #184] R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . On February 23, 2018, I filed a Report and Recommendation (R&R) addressing four motions to dismiss and one motion for judgment on the pleadings [Doc. #184]. One motion in particular was filed by the Michigan Attorney Discipline Board, the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission, and the Michigan Supreme Court [Doc. #82]. The Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission ("AGC") was not part of tha
More

ORDER AMENDING AND CORRECTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [Doc. #184]

On February 23, 2018, I filed a Report and Recommendation (R&R) addressing four motions to dismiss and one motion for judgment on the pleadings [Doc. #184]. One motion in particular was filed by the Michigan Attorney Discipline Board, the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission, and the Michigan Supreme Court [Doc. #82]. The Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission ("AGC") was not part of that motion, and I erroneously stated that the AGC had not filed a motion to dismiss. I therefore recommended that the AGC be dismissed sua sponte under the principle of Eleventh Amendment immunity.

However, the AGC in fact did file a separate motion to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings [Doc. #169]. Therefore, that part of my R&R [Doc. #184] that addresses the AGC is stricken. I will issue a separate R&R addressing the AGC's motion to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer