U.S. v. Takata Corporation, 17-mc-50300. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20180228e04
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER STRIKING OLEG YARIN'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL (Doc. 23) GEORGE CARAM STEEH , District Judge . Now before the court is Oleg Yarin's pro se motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Yarin filed three prior motions seeking the same relief (Doc. 17, 20, 21) which this court denied on the basis that there was no good faith basis for the appeal or grounds for reconsideration of the court's prior orders. Yarin is asking the court to revisit the issue it has thrice
Summary: ORDER STRIKING OLEG YARIN'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL (Doc. 23) GEORGE CARAM STEEH , District Judge . Now before the court is Oleg Yarin's pro se motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Yarin filed three prior motions seeking the same relief (Doc. 17, 20, 21) which this court denied on the basis that there was no good faith basis for the appeal or grounds for reconsideration of the court's prior orders. Yarin is asking the court to revisit the issue it has thrice ..
More
ORDER STRIKING OLEG YARIN'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL (Doc. 23)
GEORGE CARAM STEEH, District Judge.
Now before the court is Oleg Yarin's pro se motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Yarin filed three prior motions seeking the same relief (Doc. 17, 20, 21) which this court denied on the basis that there was no good faith basis for the appeal or grounds for reconsideration of the court's prior orders. Yarin is asking the court to revisit the issue it has thrice decided. There is no provision in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Local Rules which allows a litigant, even a pro se litigant, to refile the same request four times. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to STRIKE Document 23 as improvidently filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
