Filed: Mar. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING COMMISSONER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND AFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER THOMAS L. LUDINGTON , District Judge . Plaintiff Dawn Denise Hill filed an application for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act on March 6, 2013. Her application was denied, and Hill sought an administrative hearing. Her first ALJ hearing occurred on November 12, 2014. After the he
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING COMMISSONER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND AFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER THOMAS L. LUDINGTON , District Judge . Plaintiff Dawn Denise Hill filed an application for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act on March 6, 2013. Her application was denied, and Hill sought an administrative hearing. Her first ALJ hearing occurred on November 12, 2014. After the hea..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING COMMISSONER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND AFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER
THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Dawn Denise Hill filed an application for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act on March 6, 2013. Her application was denied, and Hill sought an administrative hearing. Her first ALJ hearing occurred on November 12, 2014. After the hearing, the ALJ issued a written, unfavorable decision. Hill appealed to the Appeals Council, which reversed and remanded on March 8, 2016. After the second hearing, the ALJ once again found that Hill was not disabled under the Act. The Appeals Council denied her second request for review on December 9, 2016. On January 11, 2017, Hill filed a complaint seeking judicial review of the Commissioner's final decision. ECF No. 1.
The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis. ECF No. 3. Both parties have since filed cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 14, 16. On February 27, 2018, Judge Davis issued a report recommending that Hill's motion for summary judgment be denied, the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment be granted, and Commissioner's decision be affirmed. ECF No. 17. Judge Davis found that the ALJ properly considered and weighed the medical evidence in the record and further found no compelling reason to disturb the ALJ's credibility determination.
Although the Magistrate Judge's report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, ECF No. 17, is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that Defendant Commissioner's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 16, is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff Hill's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 14, is DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security's decision is AFFIRMED.
