Watson v. Commissioner of Social Security, 16-14355. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20180320b37
Visitors: 1
Filed: Mar. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER AND OPINION ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MARCH 2, 2018 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [16] NANCY G. EDMUNDS , District Judge . Currently before the Court is the magistrate judge's March 2, 2018 report and recommendation on cross-motions for summary judgment. The Court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. "[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge's report[] releases the Court from its duty to independ
Summary: ORDER AND OPINION ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MARCH 2, 2018 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [16] NANCY G. EDMUNDS , District Judge . Currently before the Court is the magistrate judge's March 2, 2018 report and recommendation on cross-motions for summary judgment. The Court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. "[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge's report[] releases the Court from its duty to independe..
More
ORDER AND OPINION ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MARCH 2, 2018 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [16]
NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is the magistrate judge's March 2, 2018 report and recommendation on cross-motions for summary judgment. The Court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. "[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge's report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter." Hall v. Rawal, 09-10933, 2012 WL 3639070, at *1 (E.D.Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citation omitted). The Court nevertheless agrees with the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court therefore ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.
It is further ordered that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [12] is GRANTED, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [14] is DENIED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation [16].
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
