Nelson v. Choi, 15-13101. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20180425b88
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 42) TERRENCE G. BERG , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge David R. Grand's January 19, 2018 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 42), recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 38) be DENIED. The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy" of
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 42) TERRENCE G. BERG , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge David R. Grand's January 19, 2018 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 42), recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 38) be DENIED. The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy" of a..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 42)
TERRENCE G. BERG, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge David R. Grand's January 19, 2018 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 42), recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 38) be DENIED.
The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy" of a report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a "de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made." Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). The Court will therefore accept the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation of January 19, 2018 as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Grand's Report and Recommendation of January 19, 2018 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
