Jones v. Scripps Media, Inc., 16-cv-12647. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20180503g87
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 02, 2018
Latest Update: May 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL FILING OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION EXHIBIT UNDER SEAL (ECF #46) MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . On April 10, 2018, Plaintiff Odis Jones filed a motion to compel Defendant Scripps Media, Inc. to file portions of his deposition testimony under seal when Scripps files its forthcoming summary judgment motion. ( See ECF #60.) The Court held a hearing on the motion to compel on May 1, 2018. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, Jones' mo
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL FILING OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION EXHIBIT UNDER SEAL (ECF #46) MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . On April 10, 2018, Plaintiff Odis Jones filed a motion to compel Defendant Scripps Media, Inc. to file portions of his deposition testimony under seal when Scripps files its forthcoming summary judgment motion. ( See ECF #60.) The Court held a hearing on the motion to compel on May 1, 2018. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, Jones' mot..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL FILING OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION EXHIBIT UNDER SEAL (ECF #46)
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, District Judge.
On April 10, 2018, Plaintiff Odis Jones filed a motion to compel Defendant Scripps Media, Inc. to file portions of his deposition testimony under seal when Scripps files its forthcoming summary judgment motion. (See ECF #60.) The Court held a hearing on the motion to compel on May 1, 2018. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, Jones' motion is DENIED.
The Court allowed Jones to file his motion to compel under seal and allowed Scripps to file its response under seal. The Court will continue to maintain the seal on those filings, as well as on the transcript of the hearing on Jones' motion, for a limited time while Jones decides whether to appeal the Court's ruling. After Jones informs the Court of his decision, the Court will issue an additional order with respect to the current filings under seal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
