Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rodriguez v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 17-cv-13513. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20180626b87 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS THOMSON REUTERS GROUP DISABILITY INCOME INSURANCE PLAN AND THOMSON REUTERS HOLDINGS, INC. FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . In this action, Plaintiff Sherrill Rodriguez ("Plaintiff") asserts claims against Defendants Farmers Insurance Exchange, Thomson Reuters Health and Welfare Plan, CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company, UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, Thomson Reuters Group Disability Inco
More

ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS THOMSON REUTERS GROUP DISABILITY INCOME INSURANCE PLAN AND THOMSON REUTERS HOLDINGS, INC. FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

In this action, Plaintiff Sherrill Rodriguez ("Plaintiff") asserts claims against Defendants Farmers Insurance Exchange, Thomson Reuters Health and Welfare Plan, CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company, UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, Thomson Reuters Group Disability Income Insurance Plan (the "Plan"), and Thomson Reuters Holdings, Inc. ("TRHI"). (See Second Am. Compl., ECF #19.) On March 16, 2018, the Clerk of Court issued Summonses for the Plan and THRI. (See ECF #20.) On March 19, 2018, Plaintiff served THRI with the Second Amended Complaint and Summons, and THRI's Answer to the Second Amended Complaint was due on April 9, 2018. (See ECF #27.) On March 23, 2018, Plaintiff served the Plan with the Second Amended Complaint and Summons, and the Plan's Answer to the Second Amended Complaint was due on April 13, 2018. (See ECF #25.) Neither Defendant has filed an Answer or otherwise responded to the Second Amended Complaint.

On May 21, 2018, the Court entered an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause in writing by June 4, 2018 why her claims against the Plan and THRI should not be dismissed from this action for failure to prosecute. (See Order, ECF #31.) Plaintiff has not filed any response to that show cause order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against the Plan and THRI are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer