Filed: Jun. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . This is a student loan case. Default judgment was entered against Ms. Benson-Lockhart on July 2, 2007. On November 28, 2017, Plaintiff issued a writ of continuing garnishment as to Ms. Benson's wages at Nirvana Food & Beverage, Inc. Before the Court is Ms. Benson-Lockhart's objection to the garnishment [Doc. #22]. In her objection, she disputed the validity of the debt, and requested verification. At the hearing on the objections, held on June 26
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . This is a student loan case. Default judgment was entered against Ms. Benson-Lockhart on July 2, 2007. On November 28, 2017, Plaintiff issued a writ of continuing garnishment as to Ms. Benson's wages at Nirvana Food & Beverage, Inc. Before the Court is Ms. Benson-Lockhart's objection to the garnishment [Doc. #22]. In her objection, she disputed the validity of the debt, and requested verification. At the hearing on the objections, held on June 26,..
More
ORDER
R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge.
This is a student loan case. Default judgment was entered against Ms. Benson-Lockhart on July 2, 2007. On November 28, 2017, Plaintiff issued a writ of continuing garnishment as to Ms. Benson's wages at Nirvana Food & Beverage, Inc. Before the Court is Ms. Benson-Lockhart's objection to the garnishment [Doc. #22]. In her objection, she disputed the validity of the debt, and requested verification.
At the hearing on the objections, held on June 26, 2018, Ms. Benson-Lockhart stated that she had now received verification of the debt, and does not dispute the same. Further, she and the Plaintiff's attorney indicated a willingness and desire to discuss a partial payment plan or other resolution, in lieu of garnishment. Ms. Benson-Lockhart also affirmatively stated that she is withdrawing her objection [Doc. #22] so that she could pursue discussions with Plaintiff's counsel.
Accordingly, for the reasons and on the basis stated on the record on June 26, 2018, the Defendant's objection to garnishment [Doc. #22] is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
