Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Perry v. Randstad General Partner (US) LLC, 14-11240. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20180726b71 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REVIEW ACTION OF TAXATION CLERK (ECF #135) MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . On June 20, 2018, Defendant Randstad General Partner (US) LLC ("Randstad") filed a bill of costs in this action. ( See ECF #133.) On the same day, the Clerk of the Court taxed those costs. ( See ECF #134.) On June 25, 2018, Plaintiffs Judith Perry, Erin Lane, and Aimee Dooling ("Plaintiffs") filed a motion to review the action of the taxation clerk. ( See Mot., ECF #135
More

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REVIEW ACTION OF TAXATION CLERK (ECF #135)

On June 20, 2018, Defendant Randstad General Partner (US) LLC ("Randstad") filed a bill of costs in this action. (See ECF #133.) On the same day, the Clerk of the Court taxed those costs. (See ECF #134.) On June 25, 2018, Plaintiffs Judith Perry, Erin Lane, and Aimee Dooling ("Plaintiffs") filed a motion to review the action of the taxation clerk. (See Mot., ECF #135.) The Court held a telephone status conference on July 25, 2018.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Clerk's taxation of costs (ECF #134) is VACATED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Upon entry of final judgment in this action, Randstad may re-submit its bill of costs, and Plaintiffs may make any appropriate objections to that bill of costs at that time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer